Legal Opinion
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Universal Express, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 21, 2007No. 04 Civ. 2322 GELPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has accused Universal Express, Inc., Richard A. Altomare, and Chris G. Gunderson (collectively, “Organizational Defendants”) and Mark S. Neu-haus, George J. Sandhu, and Tarun Mendiratta (collectively, “Consultant Defendants”) of violating certain provisions of the federal securities laws. It now seeks summary judgment against all the defendants on claims that they offered or sold unregistered securities in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 and against all defendants except Mendiratta on…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Universal Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Silvercreek Management, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Silvercreek Mgmt., Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CKB168 Holdings, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. AltomareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.