Legal Opinion
United States v. Billy Charles Anfield
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1976No. 75-3471PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and SNEED, Circuit Judges. SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted on five (5) counts of perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. The trial court allowed a motion for judgment of acquittal as to Count One and imposed sentence on the remaining counts. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
Appellant’s indictment on five counts of perjury stemmed from his testimony before the grand jury and during the trial in the case of United States v. Leslie Jackson, CR 74-250. His involvement in the Jackson case arose when he reported a burglary of his mother’s house to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Barry v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. Birdie Louise Joshua Harris, United States of America v. Billy Charles HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. William Del Toro and William KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward LoeswickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. George Raymond DippCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Ben Farrell KirkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. William C. ScrimgeourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Armand GoguenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.