Legal Opinion

Goettl v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1992No. 90-284PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The only question presented in this case is whether law enforcement officers had probable cause to stop Edward E. Goettl (Goettl) and then to arrest him for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and conspiracy to commit that offense. Relying upon Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct. 2412, 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990), the trial court ruled that the requisite probable cause was present. Goettl argues a collateral and alternative issue with respect to the denial of a motion to suppress all evidence obtained after the stop on the ground the stop was not…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. McChesney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Morris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API