Legal Opinion
Getz v. Peace
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 17, 2018No. A18-0121PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtReyes, Judge
On appeal from the district court's calculation and offset of collateral-source payments following a jury's award of damages, appellant Ambree Getz argues that the district court erred when it deducted from the jury award the amount of the discounts negotiated under Minnesota's Prepaid Medical Assistance Program (PMAP), which she asserts are collateral sources excepted from offset as "payments made pursuant to the United States Social Security Act" under Minn. Stat. § 548.251, subd. 1(2). We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On September 25, 2012, Ambree Getz drove a motor vehicle that was struck by a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019