Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fresno Enterprise Co. v. Allen

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1885No. 9862PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.

The action is on a bond, executed by the defendants, and which is in words and figures as follows: —

“Know all men by these presents, that we, William. II. Allen, as principal, and James E. Bowe and John Haley, as sureties, are held and firmly bound to the Fresno Enterprise Company in the penal sum of $10,000, to the payment of which we bind ourselves and each of us.
“Given under our hands and seals the 1st day of September, 1881.
“The condition of this obligation is such, that, whereas, William H. Allen is secretary of the Fresno Enterprise Company, and as such, has, or may have, the custody of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hubert v. MendheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Welch v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Westervelt v. MohrenstecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Rankin v. TygardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. County of King v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Ida County Savings Bank v. SeidenstickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API