Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Rupert

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1912No. 22,086PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, Judge. Action by the First National Bank o£ Fort Wayne against Isaiah Rupert. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Bums 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Suit by appellant, a second indorsee, against appellee, the maker, on two promissory notes. Answer in three paragraphs, consisting of a general denial, failure of consideration, and fraud in the procurement of the execution of the notes by false representations of existing facts. Appellant replied that it was a bona fide holder of the notes for value, by purchase before maturity. There was a trial by jury, written instructions given, interrogatories submitted, and verdict for appellee, and judgment on verdict, after overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The errors assigned are the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tescher v. MereaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. First National Bank v. RuhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. LeachmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State ex rel. White v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Burden v. BurdenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bright National Bank v. HartmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Wheat v. GossIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Peoples State Bank v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. OesterlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API