Legal Opinion

State ex rel. White v. Scott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1908No. 21,298PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Prom Clark Circuit Court; Harry C. Montgomery, Judge. Quo warranto by the State of Indiana, on the relation of Roy L. /White, against Levi H. Scott. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This is a quo warranto, proceeding, instituted on the relation of Roy L. White, to determine the title to the office of county superintendent of schools.

The relator alleges in his information that on the first Monday in June, to wit, on June 3, 1907, he was duly elected to the office of superintendent of the schools of Ployd county; that the defendant was his predecessor in said office, and that- his term of office expired, by limitation, on said June 3; that the relator was qualified and eligible to hold the office, and had made a demand upon defendant for the office boohs and papers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Morrison v. Indianapolis & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Wampler v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Pedigo v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Indiana Life Endowment Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State Election Board v. BayhIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. McGuyer v. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Daly v. ShowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API