Commonwealth v. MARMON
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Watkins, J.,
These are appeals from the judgment of sentence by the defendants-appellants, Ruth Marmon and Joseph Bardascino, imposed after convictions on indictments charging bribery, extortion, violation of the Magistrates’ Court Act of 1937 and conspiracy.
The facts upon which the convictions were based were largely uncovered as a result of an investigation of the Philadelphia Magisterial system conducted by the Attorney General of Pennsylvania and may be summarized as follows:
On August 29, 1963, a Thursday, Mr. and Mrs. Walker contacted John J. Welsh, a committeeman and *205state…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Minerd v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. KilgallenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. DessusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Irving B. Kahn and Teleprompter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Gwinn v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. CarsiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hetherington v. McHaleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. SlickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.