Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Soukup v. Celebrezze

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1998No. 1998-0597PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 549.] THE STATE EX REL. SOUKUP, APPELLANT, v. CELEBREZZE, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Soukup v. Celebrezze,

1998-Ohio-8.] Prohibition—Writ preventing judge in divorce postdecree enforcement action from reinstating a show cause motion that was dismissed for want of prosecution and from conducting further proceedings on the reinstated motion—Writ denied, when. (No. 98-597—Submitted September 15, 1998—Decided November 10, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 72008. __________________…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Bitter v. MissigOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. O'Beirne v. Geauga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lisboa v. Galvin, 92525 (3-4-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. PesanoOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API