Legal Opinion
Anderson v. WROC-TV
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David O. Boehm, J.
In this case of apparent first impression in New York the plaintiffs are moving for summary judgment on the ground that certain affirmative defenses in the defendants’ answers have no merit and should be stricken. Although the motion is brought under CPLR 3212, it appears that the application is actually one to dismiss defenses under CPLR 3211 (subd [b]) and the motion is converted accordingly.
It appears that on the morning of September 9, 1980, defendant Ronald Storm, an investigator employed by defendant, the Humane Society of Rochester and Monroe…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berger v. HanlonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. SanusiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Reynolds v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Copeland v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Stahl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.