Legal Opinion

Woffenden v. Charouleau

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1886No. Civil No. 149½PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This was an action by the plaintiff against Anna G. Woffenden, his divorced wife, and her co-defend*92ant, in which he seeks to require her to account to him for the rents and profits of her separate real estate during coverture, and asking, also, that he he declared to he the owner of the undivided one-half of the real estate conveyed by her during coverture to her co-defendant. The plaintiff on the trial offered to prove that all the lands mentioned in the complaint were purchased during coverture, by her from the rents, issues, and profits which accrued during coverture, of her separate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charauleau v. WoffendenArizona Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Woffenden v. CharauleauArizona Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Miller v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Woffenden v. CharouleauArizona Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Estate of StarkArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stiles v. LordArizona Supreme Court · 1886
  4. In re Estate of Foster, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1909
  5. Schade v. O'HaraArizona Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API