Legal Opinion

Charauleau v. Woffenden

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the district court of the first judicial district, Pima county. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By Court,

Tweed, J.:

This action was ejectment for three quarter-sections of land being in Pinal county, and contiguous to other lands described in the complaint by their legal subdivision, and as being generally known as the Robledo, Moreno, and Duran ranches.

In his complaint the plaintiff alleges that he was seised in fee of the premises on the eleventh day of February, 1874, and while so seised, to wit, on. the fifth day of July, 1875, he was ousted by the defendant.

The answer denies that the plaintiff was ever seised,of the premises, or was ever entitled to the possession of the same or any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. George v. RansomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hall v. WeatherfordArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Staley v. Estate of HarberArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Grimditch v. GrimditchArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Horton v. HortonArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Strahan v. HaynesArizona Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API