Woffenden v. Charauleau
Arizona Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court of the first judicial district, county of Pima. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
By Court,
Tweed, J.:
The appeal is from the first district, Pima county. Counsel for the respondent, before submitting his argument upon the merits of the case, asked to be heard upon a preliminary motion to strike out from the transcript certain portions thereof as not being properly certified, citing the twelfth rule of this_court as entitling him to be heard upon such motion.
The rule invoked reads as follows: “Exceptions to the transcript, the bond or undertaking on appeal, or the notice of appeal, or to its service or proof of service, or any technical objection to the record affecting the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Estate of StarkArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Woffenden v. CharouleauArizona Supreme Court · 1886
- Stiles v. LordArizona Supreme Court · 1886
- Schade v. O'HaraArizona Supreme Court · 1938