Ames v. Hillside Coal & Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
This appeal is from a decree dismissing plaintiff’s bill on the ground of champerty. It might also have been dismissed for laches. On December 3, 1900, by a contract attached to the bill as Exhibit A, the owners of certain coal or culm banks “demised, leased and sold ......all the coal in and composing” the banks to defendant, which agreed to “screen, separate and ship” the coal “with due diligence” and to pay specified royalties per ton, varying for specified sizes and with annual mínimums, “until all the merchantable coal of the above sizes; available from the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taylor v. BemissSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Peck v. HeurichSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Williams v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Waychoff v. WaychoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Laborers Local 1298 Annuity Fund Ex Rel. Rite Aid Corp. v. GrassDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Harry Martin, Zarnoff O. Samford and Martin Trailer Toters, Inc. v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Mike Rosen & Associates, P.C. v. Omega Builders, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Belfonte v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- In Re TaylorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.