Legal Opinion

Anthony Williams v. Duke Energy International, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 1, 2012No. 10-3604PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TARNOW, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). The district court, following a hearing, found that the “filed-rate doctrine” denied the court federal question subject-matter jurisdiction. The district court also found that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO”) had exclusive jurisdiction over Defendants’ state-law claims, depriving the court of diversity jurisdiction. The district court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(1). The district court did not assess Defendants’ arguments that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. George v. Urban Settlement ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Richard L. Fowler v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. United States Ex Rel. Polukoff v. St. Mark's Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. Robert Greer v. Strange Honey FarmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  5. Gamboa v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API