Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Polukoff v. St. Mark's Hosp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 9, 2018No. 17-4014PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

*734 This is a qui tam action alleging violations of the False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 - 33, involving fraudulent reimbursements under the Medicare Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 - 1395ccc. Plaintiff Gerald Polukoff, M.D., is a doctor who worked with Defendant Sherman Sorensen, M.D. After observing some of Dr. Sorensen's medical practices, Dr. Polukoff brought this FCA action, on behalf of the United States, against Dr. Sorensen and the two hospitals where Dr. Sorensen worked (collectively, "Defendants"). Dr. Polukoff alleges Dr. Sorensen performed thousands of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. Sinclair Wyoming Refining v. A & B BuildersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States of America ex v. Keypoint Government SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Jane Winter v. Gardens Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Victoria Druding v. Care AlternativesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API