Legal Opinion
Kinek v. Gulf & Western, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1993No. Nos. 87 Civ. 6973(LBS), 87 Civ. 7023(LBS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Prior to September 30, 1981, defendant Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. (“G & W”), *355through one of its divisions, operated three facilities located in Palmerton, Pennsylvania; DePue, Illinois; and Odgensburg, New Jersey. G & W maintained a collectively bargained pension plan (the “G & W Plan”) which covered employees at these three facilities, as well as employees at seven other facilities. On September 30, 1981, G & W sold these three facilities to Horsehead Industries, Inc. (“Horsehead”) which then operated them as the New Jersey Zinc Co. (“NJ Zinc”). At the time…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Wickham Contracting Co., Inc., Ralph Perone v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Cefali v. Buffalo Brass Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990
- United Steelworkers of America v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Kinek v. Gulf & Western, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kinek v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Kinek v. Paramount CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994