Legal Opinion
Kinek v. Paramount Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 28, 1994No. 788, 789, Docket 93-6230, 93-6232PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
The appeals in these consolidated cases principally require us to determine whether, pursuant to the provisions of the pension plan agreement at issue, the defendant employer and the defendant pension plan were obligated to provide full funding of a portion of a single-employer defined benefit pension plan when that portion was “spun off’ into a new plan with a different sponsor. On the plaintiffs’ summary judgment motions on the issue of liability, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Sand, J., held that the defendants were obligated…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Schlaifer Nance & Company v. The Estate of Andy Warhol, Frederick Hughes, Edward W. Hayes, Esq., and Vincent FremontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Colin v. Marconi Commerce Systems Employees' Retirement PlanDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Bourne v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Isaac FORD, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNIROYAL PENSION PLAN, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.