Legal Opinion
United Steelworkers of America v. New Jersey Zinc Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 14, 1987No. 86-5756PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
I
Introduction
The United Steelworkers of America (Steelworkers) filed this action seeking to force the New Jersey Zinc Company (NJ Zinc), to fully fund pension benefits as its predecessor had negotiated to do. Following a bench trial the district court entered judgment against Steelworkers, finding that NJ Zinc had never agreed to be bound by the full funding contract provision relied on by Steelworkers.
Two issues are presented by Steelworkers’ appeal. First, has Steelworkers waived its right to contest a magistrate’s ruling that it was not entitled…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United Steelworkers Of America, Afl-Cio v. New Jersey Zinc CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Florence v. StanbackDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.