Legal Opinion
Kinek v. Gulf & Western, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 14, 1989No. 87 CIV. 6973 (LBS), 87 CIV. 7023 (LBS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Defendants Gulf & Western, Inc. (“G & W”) and The Pension Plan of the New Jersey Zinc Company for Bargaining Unit Employees (“G & W Plan”) have moved for summary judgment, or in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint brought by Charles Kinek, Steve Konik, Ernest Moreno, Steven Yanecko and all persons similarly situated (“Kinek plaintiffs”), alleging violations of a collectively-bargained pension agreement and pension plan under § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, and under § 502(a)(1)(B) and (a)(3) of the Employee Retirement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Murphy v. Heppenstall Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Pressroom Unions-printers League Income Security Fund v. Continental Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Davis v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kinek v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Vicinanzo Ex Rel. Vicinanzo v. Brunschwig & Fils, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Max Marx Color & Chemical Co. Employees' Profit Sharing Plan v. BarnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Picini v. Chase Home Finance LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.