Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Williams, A/K/A Malik Nash Bey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 18, 2006No. 18-1459PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to consider the admissibility of what is known as “reverse Rule 404(b)” evidence. See Rule 404(b), Federal Rules of Evidence. Defendant Richard Williams was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)) after police discovered a semiautomatic handgun in the bedroom in which he was apprehended. At trial, Williams sought to introduce evidence that another individual with whom he was arrested, Andre Urlin, had previously been convicted of possessing a firearm. The evidence was offered to show that the weapon found in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. United States v. Lydia CooperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Richard StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Greg L. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. J. StrizichMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. United States v. Linarez-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Woodham v. DubasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API