Legal Opinion
Woodham v. Dubas
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 5, 2007No. 06-2327UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
James C. Woodham, proceeding pro se, sued Donnamarie 1 Dubas. In his second, amended complaint, he alleged that Dubas, a police officer, violated his right to due process of law when she gave false statements related to the sale of methamphetamine in February and March of 2002 to support a search warrant. He also claimed that Dubas, with Woodham’s ex-girlfriend, Lorraine Pearsal, illegally entered his home without a warrant on February 5, 2002, February 19, 2002, and February 26, 2002. He sought declarations that Dubas deprived him of due process and trespassed. He also sought…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Paul Lamont Parham v. Marshall Johnson, Jr., Medical Doctor Charles J. Kozakieqicz Tom Forester, Commissioner Joseph Mazurkiewicz, ph.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Klein v. MadisonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Flythe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Moss v. Aaron's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Haan v. Wells, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013
- Bair v. Charney, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.