Hull v. Crescent Manufacturing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bonald, J., entered June 3, 1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for damages sustained in an automobile collision.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action arose ont of a collision between an automobile and a motor truck. Each party charged the other with negligence, which in turn was denied. Plaintiffs alleged the damages to their automobile were $221.23. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The court found that defendant was negligent and that plaintiffs had been damaged thereby in the sum of $175, and entered judgment in that amount against defendant, from which judgment the appeal has been taken.
The facts are somewhat in dispute, but a consideration of all the evidence satisfies us, as it did the trial court, that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Yuill v. BerrymanWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Jahn & Co. v. PaynterWashington Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Saad v. LangworthyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Hirst v. Standard Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Groeschell v. Washington Chocolate Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- Pacific Match Co. v. Burroughs Adding MacHine Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930