Legal Opinion

LaPlant v. Schuman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

The facts are not in serious dispute. It appears that, for some years prior to January 6, 1914, Charles T. LaPlant was thp husband of plaintiff, and was the owner of lots 10, 11, and 12 in Block 7 in the city of Mar-shalltown. The tract so designated is bounded on 8011^ and east by streets, and on the north and west by public alleys. The lots, each 60 feet in width, front on the street to the south, Lot 10 lying on the west, and Lot 11 adjoining it on the east. Charles T. LaPlant erected four dwelling houses on the tract, three on Lot 12, and one on Lot 11, fronting on the street to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Morrison v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Marshall Ice Co. v. LaPlantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Carrigg v. Mechanics Bank of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Kane v. TemplinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Larue v. Greene County BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rischall v. BauchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Culver v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Farmers & Mechanics Sav. Bank of Mpls. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API