Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Brookings Mall, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1984No. 14357PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment cancelling a written lease on space rented for a shoe store in the Brook-ings Mall located at Brookings, South Dakota. We affirm.

Appellant, Brookings Mall, Inc., operates a shopping mall. Appellee Hicks operates a shoe store within the Brookings Mall under an assigned lease agreement. The lease agreement was originally entered into between the Mall and Lee and Connie Col-burn on October 10, 1977, which lease was a partially preprinted, standard form lease prepared by appellant.

Under the terms of the lease agreement, the lease…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mulder v. TagueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of Sioux Falls v. Henry Carlson Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Jones v. American Oil CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Christiansen v. StrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Young v. HuffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. O'Neill v. Blue Cross of Western Iowa & South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Smith v. Highmore Farm Ltd. PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. HC Clark Implement Co., Inc. v. WiedmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API