Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Henry Carlson Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1977No. 11805PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZASTROW, Justice.

The City of Sioux Falls (City) has appealed from the trial court’s determination denying its claim for refund of progress payments made to defendants Henry Carlson Company, Inc. (Carlson) and Ron M. Fiegen, Inc. (Fiegen) pursuant to a remodeling contract for the Sioux Falls Coliseum Annex prior to its destruction. We affirm.

In 1972, the City contracted with Carlson and Fiegen to remodel the Sioux Falls Coliseum Annex. The remodeling project was substantially completed when a fire destroyed the Annex on January 5,1973. Before the fire, Carlson had received $61,-529.40 on a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eberle v. McKeownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Jones v. American Oil CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Steensland v. NoelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. The Collegian v. HilemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bedell v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API