Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided December 30, 1991No. 1:91-cr-00024PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on counter-claimant’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion to Strike. Counter-claimant (“Velsicol”) has filed this combined Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), 12(f) and 12(h). Velsicol wants this Court to determine, as a matter of law, that Plaintiffs are “liable” persons under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) § 107(a), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). Velsicol also moves this Court under Rule 12(f) to strike some of Plaintiffs’ affirmative…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Marisol, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Fleet Factors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  5. Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moore v. McCalla Raymer, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  2. Aviall Services, Inc. v. Cooper Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States ex rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
  4. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  5. Pine Ridge Recycling, Inc. v. Butts County, Ga.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API