Legal Opinion
United States v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 2, 1991No. Civ. A. R-88-2933, R-89-2870PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAMSEY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above-captioned case is plaintiff United States of America’s motion to strike certain defenses of the various defendants. This motion has
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case involves a 210 acre tract of land located near Cumberland, Maryland known as the Limestone Road Site. In 1982, the EPA tested the site and found high levels of inorganic and organic compounds considered hazardous under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq. Subsequently, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Kelley v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Clark v. MilamDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
- United States v. USX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.