Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 7, 1989No. K86-164, K86-167PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on plaintiff United States’s Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff asserts that the bulk of the defenses which have been asserted by defendants are, as a matter of law, not defenses to the claim asserted here by the United States under Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S. C. § 9607, for recovery of costs incurred in responding to releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances.…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
  2. United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  3. United States v. Marisol, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. In Re National Gypsum Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
  5. United States of America, State of New York v. Alcan Aluminum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API