Gay Hill Field Service v. Board of Review

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Petitioner, Gay Hill Field Service (“Gay Hill”), appeals from an order of the Industrial Commission affirming an administrative determination that sums paid to interviewers contracting with Gay Hill constituted wages for services in employment pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 35-4-22(j)(l), 35 — 4—22(j)(5), and 35-4-22(p) (1985) of the Utah Employment Security Act (“the Act”). We affirm.

Because it is integral to our decision, we set out the factual background in detail. On appeal, we view the facts in the light most favorable to the agency’s findings. See Wilson v.…