Alta Pacific Associates, Ltd. v. Utah State Tax Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Concurrence · McIFFMcIFF, District Judge
I concur in the result reached in the lead opinion and generally concur with its reasoning. I write separately to address two matters: (1) the applicable standard of review and (2) the importance of considering the duration of the federal contracts and the rental subsidies.
A. Standard of Review
The lead opinion concludes that the Commission’s decision to treat federally subsidized projects as a distinctly separate type of property and to consider the benefits and burdens of the federal contracts amounts to a finding of fact. As such, it would be entitled to “deference,” governed by a…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Durham.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Kankakee County Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Rio Algom Corp. v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Kennecott Corp. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.