Legal Opinion
Hobbs v. Heisey
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 8, 2012No. 2110275PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Judge.
Scott Christopher Hobbs (“the father”) appeals from a judgment of the Madison Circuit Court (“the trial court”) that denied his motion to vacate all judgments or orders regarding the custody of B.C.H. (“the child”) that were entered after March 2002. We affirm.
Procedural Background
The father and Dorarena Kay Heisey (“the mother”) are the parents of the child, who was born in February 1997 during the parties’ marriage. The parties separated when the child was a toddler and were *189eventually divorced by a judgment entered by the trial court in 2000. By agreement, the parties shared…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ex Parte McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Bass v. HoaglandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- A.S. v. T.R.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Casey v. CaseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- J.C.T. v. Mobile County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013