Legal Opinion

Looney v. State

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 24, 2010No. 2090694PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Joe Looney, Jr., who is currently incarcerated at the Bibb Correctional Facility, appeals from a judgment denying his motion for relief from an underlying judgment ordering the forfeiture of $680 in United States currency. Looney filed his motion pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. R. Civ. P., alleging that he had not received notice of the underlying forfeiture action, in violation of his right to due process. Therefore, he contended, the forfeiture judgment was void.

The record indicates the following. On May 22, 2008, the Ashville Police Department executed a search warrant at Looney’s house in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McConico v. PattersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  2. Gallant v. GallantCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  3. Hobbs v. HeiseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Casey v. CaseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  5. Simmons v. DuBose Construction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API