Legal Opinion
Sissoko v. Rocha
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 15, 2007No. 02-56751, 03-55667PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BERZON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge SKOPIL.
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 16, 2006 is hereby withdrawn and replaced by this concurrently filed opinion. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
The factual and procedural background of these appeals is set out in our now-withdrawn opinion. See Sissoko v. Rocha, 440 F.3d 1145, 1149-53 (9th Cir.2006). We adopt the “scope of review” section of our prior opinion, id. at 1153-54, and affirm the district court’s denial of Rocha’s motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wilkie v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Humphries v. Various Federal Usins EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Foster v. TownsleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Mirmehdi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Syed Tazu v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Elgharib v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Araceli Rodriguez v. Lonnie SwartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.