Legal Opinion
Humphries v. Various Federal Usins Employees
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1999No. 96-10383PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Alexander Tito Humphries, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his various civil rights and contract claims as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), now designated 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)©. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I
The complaint presently before us consists of numerous handwritten pages, submitted along with various attachments in the form of what purport to be original documents and photocopies of such documents. The complaint as a■ whole is difficult to understand, but generally appears to allege the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Aguilar v. United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of the Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- North American Butterfly Association v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Claudio Arce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Santiago Alvarez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Syed Tazu v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.