Legal Opinion

People v. Western Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2013No. B239848PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*319Opinion

MANELLA, J.

INTRODUCTION

Western Insurance Company (Western), the corporate surety on a $200,000 bail bond, appeals from an order denying its motion to vacate forfeiture and exonerate bail. Western contends the bail bond should be exonerated because the trial court materially increased the surety’s risk beyond the terms of the bond agreement when the court permitted the defendant and principal, Chester Vidal Dizon, to leave the United States for the Philippines without Western’s knowledge or consent. We agree, and accordingly, reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 10, 2010,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. McReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. North Beach Bonding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Safety National Casualty Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. Bankers Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. N. River Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Co. of Los Angeles v. Financial Casualty & SuretyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API