Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank of Charlotte v. Misenheimer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The appeal in this ease involves the construction of the will of Thomas M. Misenheimer, and the principal question presented is whether the testator’s use of the words “my life insurance” manifested the intention to dispose of policies of insurance in which Charles A. Misenheimer was named beneficiary as well as those policies made payable to his estate.

The appellant contends that the language used, considered in connection with the attendant circumstances, indicates the intention to include the policies payable to Charles A. Misenheimer in the bequest contained in the second item of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Elmore v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. McGehee v. . McGeheeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Whitten v. PeaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Isler v. . IslerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Benton v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Lamb v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Mansour v. RabilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API