Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh Press Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Pittsburgh Mailers Union Local No. 22, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 27, 1992No. 1:91-cv-01465PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
WALD, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Pittsburgh Press Company (“Press”) seeks review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) concluding that the Printing, Publishing & Media Workers Sector of Communication Workers of America, Mailers Union, Local No. 22, AFL-CIO (“Union”) did not commit an unfair labor practice in violation of subsection 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(1)(A) (“NLRA” or “Act”), by charging part-time mailroom…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ramaprakash v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- State of Ohio v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Tns, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Harter Tomato Products Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.