E. Piphany, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT’S DUTY TO DEFEND; DENYING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES WARE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
E.piphany (“Plaintiff’) brings this diversity action against St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (“Defendant”), alleging breach of contract and seeking declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Plaintiff insurance policyholder alleges that Defendant insurance carrier had a duty to defend Plaintiff in an underlying litigation (“Underlying Action”), 1 pursuant to the terms of the parties’ insurance policy…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
- General Star Indemnity Co. v. Driven Sports, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- LL B Sheet 1, LLC v. LoskutoffDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Green4All Energy Solutions, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.