Legal Opinion
Gruening v. Sucic
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 80-1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff’s complaint states two causes of action. Count I is an action against defendants Sucic for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligent operation of their motor vehicle. Count II is an action against defendant State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (State Farm)—insurer of both plaintiff and the Sucics—in which plaintiff seeks punitive damages. Plaintiff alleges that State Farm maliciously breached its fiduciary relationship with him when *574the same insurance adjuster represented both plaintiff and the Sucics, and then used all the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Vulcan Society of Westchester County v. Fire Department of White PlainsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Kedra v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Fair Housing Development Fund Corp. v. BurkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Morris v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Russell v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Pena v. McArthurDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
- Beaulieu v. Concord Group InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.