Legal Opinion

River Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1982No. 81-742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question presented for resolution herein is whether the commission has engaged in unlawful, retroactive ratemaking. Appellant argues that “the proper treatment of supplier refunds must be determined by the tariffs in effect when the service to which the refunds relate was rendered.” To do otherwise, would, according to appellant, constitute an illegal action on the part of the commission. For the reasons stated below, we disagree.

It is axiomatic that before there can be retroactive rate-making, there must, at the very least, be ratemaking. We are not convinced that the commission’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Franklin County Welfare Rights Organization v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Review of the Alt. Energy Rider Contained in the Tariffs of Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In re Review of the Alt. Energy Rider Contained in the Tariffs of Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In re Review of the Alt. Energy Rider Contained in the Tariffs of Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API