Legal Opinion
Madrid v. Rodriguez
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 2003No. 27,399PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Petitioners Evilia Madrid and Cinesio Sanchez appeal from a memorandum opinion of the Court of Appeals affirming an adverse decision and order of the district court. See Madrid v. Rodriguez (In re Estate of Duran), No. 21,384 (N.M.Ct.App. Feb. 13, 2002). The district court ruled that Petitioners have no interest in a tract of real property claimed by the estate of their deceased brother Salome Duran, and that they therefore are not entitled to the remedy of a constructive trust, because Decedent had acquired title to all of the property through adverse possession.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Getz v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of USNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Garcia v. Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- DeArmond v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Estate of DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Mahabir v. Heirs of GeorgeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Deaton v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.