In re Lowenthal
California Supreme Court
Proceeding for the disbarment of Hymes H. Lowenthal from his office of attorney and counselor at law*. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
— This is an accusation for the disbarment of the respondent, an attorney of this court. The accusation charges generally “that heretofore, to wit, at the several times hereinafter mentioned, said Lowenthal violated the said oath taken by him as such attorney and counselor at law, by, — 1. Not maintaining the respect due to the courts of justice and judicial officers of his state; 2. By counseling and maintaining a defense to an action which did not appear to him legal or just; 3. By employing means in defense of an action which were inconsistent with truth; 4. By misleading in an action in…
2Cited by17 opinions
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- In Re the Disbarment of BaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- In re the Disbarment of SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Rudolph v. Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- The Florida Bar v. McCainSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.