Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Conahan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1991No. 52 E.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether the Superior Court erred in determining that the mandatory sentence for driving under the influence, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731, precludes a credit for time served voluntarily in inpatient alcohol rehabilitation. We find that time served in such “institutionalized” rehabilitation is sufficient “custody” for purposes of crediting “time served” because it falls within the definition of “imprisonment.” Accordingly, since Conahan was sentenced initially to the mandatory minimum, it was thereafter within the discretion of the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KristonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. SojournerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. ConahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. ChiappiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Harden v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. CozzoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. WegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API