Commonwealth v. Conahan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The issue before this Court is whether the Superior Court erred in determining that the mandatory sentence for driving under the influence, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731, precludes a credit for time served voluntarily in inpatient alcohol rehabilitation. We find that time served in such “institutionalized” rehabilitation is sufficient “custody” for purposes of crediting “time served” because it falls within the definition of “imprisonment.” Accordingly, since Conahan was sentenced initially to the mandatory minimum, it was thereafter within the discretion of the trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KristonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. SojournerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. ConahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by52 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ChiappiniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Harden v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. CozzoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. WegleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.