Legal Opinion
George W. Breniser v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided September 19, 2011No. 09-0728PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOELEN, Judge:
The appellant, George W. Breniser, appeals through counsel a February 5, 2009, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision in which the Board denied his claim for entitlement to a higher rate of special monthly compensation (SMC) on account of being in need of the aid and attendance of another person or on account of being housebound.1 Record of Proceedings (R.) at 3-12. Panel consideration is required to determine whether a veteran who is receiving SMC for the loss of use of both feet under 38 U.S.C. § 1114(1) is entitled to a higher rate of SMC under 38 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kurt Prokarym v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2015
- Cook v. SnyderUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2017
- Robert H. Gray v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2015
- Lillie M. Wingard v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
- James J. Perciavalle v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.