Legal Opinion
Lillie M. Wingard v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 16, 2013No. 11-1214PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOELEN, Judge:
The appellant, Lillie M. Wingard, the daughter of the deceased veteran, Charlie N. Wingard, appeals through counsel a January 11, 2011, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision that denied non-service-connected burial benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 2302. Record of Proceedings (R.) at 3-11. 1 This appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252(a) and 7266(a). This matter was referred to a panel of the Court to address Ms. Wingard’s arguments (1) that the requirement that a veteran be “in receipt of…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wingard v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. GibsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Sherman E. Morris v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Antonio Pacheco v. Sloan D. GibsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Lillie M. Wingard v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.