Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Koester

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 17, 2004No. 50941-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Robert and Judith Koester purchased property in a subdivision governed by covenants that required lot owners to obtain approval from an architectural control committee (ACC) before beginning construction. The Koesters built a pool and mechanical room, and were sued by their neighbors. Although the Koesters had submitted plans, the trial court found that they had deliberately and knowingly violated the consent to construction covenant because the final construction was based on revised plans that had not been properly submitted for approval. The trial court ordered the Koesters to return the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Unigard Insurance v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Unigard Ins. Co. v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INS.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Peterson v. KoesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API