Legal Opinion

Unigard Insurance v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 4, 2011No. 64516-1-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Mutual of Enumclaw breached its duty of good faith to defend its insured. Because of the breach, harm to the insured was presumed and Mutual of Enumclaw had the burden to rebut this presumption. Having failed to carry its burden at trial, Mutual of Enumclaw seeks reversal primarily based on alleged errors that are neither preserved nor properly assigned. We reverse in part only because the trial court applied the wrong rate of prejudgment interest.

Becker, J.

*917f 2 Charles Engelmann bought property in 1979 that was formerly used as a dry cleaning facility. After owning the property for about…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Public Utility District No. 2 v. Comcast of Washington IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. TJ Landco, LLC v. Harley C. Douglass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Mutual Of Enumclaw, App./cross-res v. Myong Suk Day, Res/cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. MKB Constructors v. American Zurich InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API