Batiste v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision by Appellee Arkansas Department of Human Services (“DHS”) denying Appellants’ Linda and Abrham Batistes’1 petition for an adoption subsidy. On appeal, Mrs. Batiste argues that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) was in error because: (1) DHS’s failure to inform of the availability of the federal adoption subsidy constitutes an extenuating circumstance warranting reconsideration of the subsidy application; (2) DHS’s method of administering the subsidy program violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wright v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Arkansas State Police Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- BD. OF EXAMINERS IN COUNSELING v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Williams v. Arkansas State Board of Physical TherapySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Bell v. BershearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Collie v. Arkansas State Medical BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Rice v. TannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Brookshire v. AdcockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Staton v. Arkansas State Board of Collection AgenciesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Watt v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.