Moskowitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Appellee recovered a verdict and judgment upon provisions in insurance policies 1 providing for total and permanent disability benefits. The company’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial were overruled, and it appealed.
Appellee was found to be within the 60 year age-limit, and no point has been made here concerning that controversy raised in the court below. It is not dis puted that orf July 3, 1941, appellee injured his right hand in a crumbing machine in his bakery establishment, and that it was amputated at the metacarpal joints with the exception of the thumb.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- De Reeder v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Feigenbaum v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Cobb v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Piso v. Weirton Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Moskowitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Bundy v. National Safety Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964